Author: Michael Tewes
The Evolving Importance of Axial Crack Detection in Hydrogen and CO₂ Pipelines
In a nutshell:
Hydrogen and CO2 pipelines introduce new mechanical and fracture‑mechanics challenges that make the smallest axial cracks critical to pipeline safety. As sensitivity requirements increase across future‑fuel networks, inspection technologies must evolve. Recent advancements in EMAT‑based crack detection support the reliable detection of smaller, earlier‑stage defects and help safeguard the integrity of multi‑fuel pipeline systems. As operators plan for hydrogen and CO2 transport, the ability to detect and characterize axial cracks with increasing sensitivity becomes a key foundation of long‑term integrity planning. Michael Tewes, an expert in crack inspection technologies and future fuels with the ROSEN Group explores how hydrogen and CO2 alter risk profiles, and which inspection principles support reliable integrity management. This provides insights into why axial crack detection is becoming an essential capability for the safe transport of future‑fuels.
As hydrogen and carbon dioxide pipeline networks are expected to expand to support energy transition objectives, axial crack detection is emerging as one of the most critical aspects of pipeline integrity management. The shift from transporting conventional natural gas to transporting future fuels introduces new material behaviors, operating regimes, and risk profiles. Recent industry research and field experience reveal a clear pattern: accurate, early, and sensitive detection of axial cracks is essential for enabling the safe, large‑scale transport of hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
Because of these changing conditions, inspection technologies must detect increasingly small and subtle axial crack-like anomalies. Technologies, such as Ultrasonic Testing (UT) and Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT), will play central roles in this. Each technology has distinct advantages based on its physical principles, application environment, and sensitivity characteristics.
Technology overview: Why sensitivity matters
UT and EMAT technologies are recognized methods for inspecting gas pipelines, yet their operational principles lead to differences that become especially relevant when considering the evolving demands placed on pipeline infrastructure. UT relies on transmitting ultrasonic sound waves through a liquid coupling medium to enable precise wall‑thickness measurements and detailed crack characterization, making it an important and widely trusted method for crack detection. However, the reliance on a coupling medium introduces limitations for hydrogen and CO2 pipelines which cannot easily be fully or partially filled with a liquid. This greatly increases the operational complexity of a UT inspection in a gas pipeline.
EMAT, on the other hand, induces ultrasonic sound waves directly within the pipe wall, without requiring liquid coupling. This allows it to operate reliably in gas pipelines, regardless if natural gas, hydrogen or CO2. EMAT can also detect coating disbondment providing a broader view of pipeline health. Recent developments in EMAT technology have improved sensitivity, increased sensor coverage, and strengthened detection probabilities, making EMAT particularly well aligned with the emerging requirements of hydrogen and CO2 pipelines.
Hydrogen pipelines: Increased sensitivity requirements
Hydrogen fundamentally alters the structural reliability landscape of steel pipelines. Its embrittling effect reduces ductility, lowers fracture toughness, and accelerates fatigue crack growth. This means that small, shallow cracks that would not be a major concern in natural gas service may become critical under hydrogen service, particularly if there is pressure cycling.
The recent development of EMAT-C Ultra includes higher sensor coverage, dual clockwise–counterclockwise sound paths, and refinements in signal quality when compared with existing EMAT systems. These improvement collectively support higher detection reliability for axial cracking, including the capability to detect comparatively small features in the pipe body.
This level of sensitivity directly supports hydrogen‑specific engineering critical assessments (ECAs), where acceptable defect dimensions are typically smaller than in natural gas operations. Consequently, repurposing to hydrogen demands more precise anomaly characterization and a better understanding of how material behaves under hydrogen exposure.
Across the industry , a consistent conclusion emerges: hydrogen service requires the detection of smaller axial defects than previous pipeline applications, making advanced EMAT‑based inspection increasingly important.
CO2 Pipelines: Managing rapid crack propagation risks
Transporting CO2 via pipelines introduces a different set of fracture‑mechanics challenges, particularly when operating in the dense phase. Unlike hydrogen, which raises concerns around embrittlement, CO2’s decompression characteristics can promote rapid crack propagation from axial flaws, if not properly mitigated.
High‑pressure CO2 transport requires proactive, high‑resolution inspection programs. Safe network expansion depends on thorough in-line inspection (ILI) processes that can identify axial cracks before they grow into critical cracks, particularly given CO2’s sensitivity to containment breaches and the associated public‑safety and environmental considerations.
In this context, axial crack detection is not just an engineering concern – it is a foundational element of public confidence and regulatory compliance in future CCUS networks.
Inspection strategy in repurposed pipelines
The transition to future fuels is expected to rely heavily on repurposed natural gas infrastructure. This significantly increases the relevance of legacy material properties, weld conditions, and recorded anomaly populations.
Repurposing frameworks emphasize that:
- Planar (axial) anomalies become critical assessment drivers when pipelines transition from natural gas to hydrogen.
- Hydrogen material property verification (MPV) and updated toughness testing are necessary to assess and cracks detected appropriately.
These points reinforces the idea that axial crack detection involves more than just identifying features; it also enables more accurate, data‑driven integrity decisions throughout repurposing projects.
Toward a multi‑fuel crack detection paradigm
Across hydrogen and CO2 pipeline applications, three themes consistently appear in recent technical work:
- Axial cracks pose a common threat to the integrity of future fuel pipelines.
Hydrogen increases the sensitivity of materials to small cracks, while CO2 increases the consequences of crack propagation. Both require tailored crack inspection strategies. - Advanced EMAT technologies are becoming central to managing planar anomalies.
EMAT‑C Ultra developments demonstrate improved sensitivity, reliability, and compatibility with dry‑gas inspection – critical attributes for both hydrogen and CO2 pipeline operations. - Data quality and verification frameworks are increasingly important.
Field‑verified anomaly databases, updated material property verification methodologies, and hydrogen‑specific testing protocols ensure accurate assessments based on crack detection results.
These advancements suggest that axial crack detection will be one of the defining capabilities enabling the safe expansion of hydrogen and CO2 pipeline networks.
Aligning inspection technology, material characterization, and integrity strategies can help the industry build a robust foundation for safely transporting hydrogen and CO₂ and ultimately achieving broader decarbonization goals.
Conclusion
The transition to future fuels is reshaping the way we manage pipeline integrity. Hydrogen requires higher detection sensitivity and CO2 demands rigorous containment and fracture‑control strategies. In both cases, axial cracks have become a central focus – from technical, operational, and risk‑management standpoints.
Thus, effective axial crack detection and assessment is indispensable for ensuring the safety, reliability, and public acceptance of future pipeline networks. Operators who strengthen their crack management frameworks today will be better positioned to ensure regulatory compliance, public confidence, and safe pipeline operations in the decades ahead.
Michael Tewes
Expert in Crack Inspection Technologies and Future Fuels
Michael Tewes leads ROSEN’s inspection activities in Europe related to Future Fuels and Crack Detection. He has been working for ROSEN for more than fifteen years. As part of the worldwide acting group at ROSEN, he has supported and advised numerous inspection projects around the world. Michael holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Applied Science Osnabrueck, Germany.